文章摘要
朱海霖,李佳韵,魏潇洋,谭超群,夏传安.多因子与数值模型法评价邵武市何家组泥石流危险性[J].矿产勘查,2026,17(3):545-555
多因子与数值模型法评价邵武市何家组泥石流危险性
Assessment of debris flow hazard using numerical modeling and multi-factor analysis: A case study in Hejiazu, Shaowu City an3, 5
投稿时间:2025-07-20  
DOI:10.20008/j.kckc.202603011
中文关键词: 泥石流  危险性  多因子法  数值模型法
英文关键词: debris flow  hazard  multi-factor analysis  numerical modeling
基金项目:本文受国家自然科学基金(42477165)和自然资源部丘陵山地地质灾害防治重点实验室开放基金项目(FJKLGH2024K008)联合资助。
作者单位
朱海霖 福建省闽北地质大队地质环境调查所,福建南平 354000 
李佳韵 福建技术师范学院近海流域环境测控治理福建省高校重点实验室,福建福清 350300 
魏潇洋 福州大学空间数据挖掘与信息共享教育部重点实验室,福建福州 350108 
谭超群 浙江省工程物探勘察设计院有限公司,浙江杭州 310005 
夏传安 福州大学空间数据挖掘与信息共享教育部重点实验室,福建福州 350108
福州大学紫金地质与矿业学院,福建福州 350108 
摘要点击次数: 73
全文下载次数: 28
中文摘要:
      泥石流危险性评价是灾害预警与防治的关键基础工作,兼具重要的科学价值与工程意义。当前,多因子 法与数值模型法虽广泛应用,但二者在评价机制、适用条件及结果可靠性方面的系统对比仍较为缺乏。 本文以福建省邵武市大竹镇吴坑村何家组泥石流为例,通过野外勘察与多源数据融合,量化了地形、物源 和降水等因子的影响,构建并校准了 Massflow数值模型,改进了危险性等级划分标准,并综合对比两种方 法的评价结果。研究表明:数值模型模拟堆积方量为 4.584×104 m3,与实际调查值(4.6×104 m3)相对误差仅 0.35%;流通区与低洼区危险性较高,不宜布局重要设施;相较于多因子法,数值模型能够再现泥石流动态 运移过程,更精确刻画危险性的时空分布特征。研究成果可为泥石流危险性评价方法的选择与防灾工程 设计提供理论依据和实践参考。
英文摘要:
      Debris flow hazard assessment is fundamental to disaster early warning and mitigation, bearing sig-nificant scientific and engineering importance. Although both multi-factor analysis and numerical modeling arewidely employed, systematic comparisons of their evaluation mechanisms, applicability, and result reliability remainlimited. This study examines a debris flow event in Hejia Group, Wukeng Village, Dazhu Town, Shaowu City, FujianProvince. By integrating field survey data and multi-source monitoring information, we quantified key influencingfactors such as topography, material source, and rainfall, constructed and calibrated a Massflow numerical model,and improved the criteria for hazard classification. A comparative analysis of the two methods was conducted. Re-sults indicate that the simulated deposition volume from the numerical model is 4.584×104 m3, with a relative error of only 0.35% compared to the measured value (4.6×104 m3). High hazard levels were identified in the transport zoneand low-lying deposition area, suggesting these locations are unsuitable for critical infrastructure. Compared tomulti-factor analysis, numerical simulation effectively reproduces the dynamic process of debris flow and more accu-rately characterizes the spatiotemporal distribution of hazard intensity. The findings provide a theoretical basis andpractical reference for the selection of assessment methodologies and the design of engineering mitigation measures.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭